Why ADCC and IBJJF look like two different sports
Same technical base, two competitions that look nothing alike. The difference is not cultural: it sits in a few lines of the rulebook, and you can read it.
BJJ Square · Updated on 08/11/2026
You watch an IBJJF final and an ADCC final and struggle to believe it is the same sport. In the first they fight on the ground almost straight away, with a guard game refined to the millimetre; in the second they wrestle on the feet, they go at each other, they hunt the submission. The techniques are the same. What changes is what pays off.
IBJJF: pulling guard costs nothing
In the IBJJF rulebook the points go like this: 2 for a takedown, a sweep and knee on belly; 3 for the guard pass; 4 for mount and back control.
You hear it said that the IBJJF “gives points for guard”. That is not true, and the real point is more interesting: pulling guard gives zero. But attempting a takedown means risking handing two to the opponent. If one choice costs zero and the other can cost two, the rational choice is obvious.
Note The rulebook did not reward the guard game: it stopped punishing the people who chose it. It is a difference that looks subtle and has produced twenty years of competition.
ADCC: pulling guard is a point off
The ADCC is built the other way round, in two moves.
- The first half has no positive points. In the finals they fight ten minutes in which only negative points are counted, then another ten on full scoring.
- Pulling guard is a penalty. In so many words: anyone who attempts a takedown and within less than three seconds pulls guard takes a minus. The same goes for passivity, for anyone who disengages and does not re-engage, and for anyone repeatedly going off the mat.
In a match where for ten minutes you cannot gain points but you can lose them, the waiting game does not pay. And since leg locks are unrestricted, heel hooks included, staying underneath is not a safe place either.
The result, measured
Across 190 matches from the 2015 and 2017 ADCC, the takedowns-per-match ratio is 41% at the ADCC against 14% at the IBJJF — almost three times as many. In the 66 kg category the gap reaches 22% against 5%. And of 282 successful offensive actions, 116 were wrestling-derived.
The wrestling-style sweep from underneath is today the most used route to the reversal: ahead of half guard, De La Riva and closed guard.
The rulebook follows, it does not lead
There is a date that proves it. 1 January 2021: the IBJJF makes heel hooks and knee-twisting attacks, reaping and inside ashi garami legal for brown and black belts, no-gi only. They remain banned for white, blue and purple belts, and for all Master categories.
This is not a federation opening a road: it is a federation acknowledging a game that had already become dominant elsewhere. It is worth keeping in mind every time somebody explains the difference between two schools with culture or with mentality. Often it is just a sheet of rules.
What we do not know
- Since when the ADCC has penalised the guard pull. The public rulebook carries neither a date nor a version number: we cannot say whether the rule has been there since 1998 or was added later.
- When the IBJJF introduced the rule on the double guard pull. The sources where we found it do not date it.
If you are wondering which of the two is “real jiu-jitsu”, that is the wrong question. They are two different games built on the same base, and most practitioners do neither: they just go to the gym.
Frequently asked questions
- Does the IBJJF give points for pulling guard?
- No, it gives zero. The point is that it does not penalise it either, while attempting a takedown exposes you to the risk of handing over two: it is this imbalance that favoured the guard game.
- What happens if you pull guard at the ADCC?
- You take a negative point if you do it within three seconds of a takedown attempt. In the first half of the match, moreover, only negative points are counted.
- Why are there more takedowns at the ADCC?
- Across 190 matches analysed from the 2015 and 2017 ADCC, the takedowns-per-match ratio is 41% against the IBJJF's 14%. It is the direct effect of the rulebook.
- Since when has the IBJJF allowed heel hooks?
- Since 1 January 2021, for adult brown and black belts and in no-gi only. They remain banned for the lower belts and for all Master categories.
Share this guide
Read next
- How the guard changed in forty yearsUntil the Eighties you did not attack from closed guard: you survived there. The rest happened in forty years, and it can be dated.
- The stories few people knowAlmost everything you read about the history of jiu-jitsu comes from the people who won that history. That does not make it false: it means you have to read it knowing as much.
- BJJ belts: ranks, timelines and how promotions workIn Brazilian jiu-jitsu you change belt only a handful of times, and it takes a long while. It is one of the things that sets it apart from other martial arts.
- The UFC began as the biggest Gracie Challenge everA videotape, a magazine article and a marketing decision that was stated openly. And the reason why it was Royce and not Rickson who fought in Denver in 1993.
- IBJJF, ADCC, AJP: who runs what, and why the rules changeThere is no such thing as “the jiu-jitsu rulebook”. There are different organisations with different ideas about what ought to be rewarded — and the differences are not details.